WULX vs. BEX
WULX (Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF) and BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
WULX vs. BEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WULX
- 1D
- -11.17%
- 1M
- -33.99%
- 6M
- 68.38%
- YTD
- 113.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEX
- 1D
- -9.39%
- 1M
- -22.93%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WULX vs. BEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WULX Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF | -18.72% |
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -50.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between WULX and BEX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WULX vs. BEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) and Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WULX vs. BEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULX drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, which is greater than BEX's maximum drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULX and BEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WULX | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -55.26% | -5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.76% | -55.26% | +9.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.10% | -28.37% | -0.73% |
Volatility
WULX vs. BEX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WULX | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.70% | 227.12% | -38.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.70% | 227.12% | -38.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.70% | 227.12% | -38.42% |
WULX vs. BEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WULX and BEX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
WULX vs. BEX - Dividend Comparison
Neither WULX nor BEX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WULX and BEX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WULX and BEX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
WULX and BEX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Tradr.
Find the right allocation for WULX and BEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer