PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTRCX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund (WTRCX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTRCX achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than FLCPX's 8.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WTRCX having a 16.46% annualized return and FLCPX not far behind at 15.64%.


WTRCX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.79%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.14%
1Y
20.84%
3Y*
27.97%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
16.46%

FLCPX

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.23%
6M
6.89%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTRCX
Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund
9.94%14.15%51.17%22.71%-18.51%27.71%20.70%30.09%-5.39%19.44%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
8.23%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between WTRCX and FLCPX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2016

0.95

The correlation between WTRCX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTRCX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTRCX
WTRCX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WTRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WTRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund (WTRCX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTRCXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.69

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

12.06

-3.96

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTRCX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTRCX drawdown since its inception was -54.41%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTRCX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTRCXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.41%

-33.87%

-20.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-8.89%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.46%

-18.76%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.66%

-24.40%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.66%

-33.87%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-3.12%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-4.17%

-16.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

1.97%

+0.75%

Volatility

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund (WTRCX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 4.89%. This indicates that WTRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTRCXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

4.89%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

9.95%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

12.58%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.99%

17.17%

+12.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.15%

18.18%

+6.97%

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTRCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTRCX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

WTRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.83%, more than FLCPX's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.52%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%
WTRCX
Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund
20.83%22.90%36.18%16.84%19.28%15.56%2.66%12.05%18.38%7.10%3.92%7.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, WTRCX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WTRCX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to FLCPX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTRCX dropped -54.41% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTRCX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer