PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTPI vs. XYLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTPI vs. XYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTPI achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than XYLG's 7.51% return.


WTPI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.45%
YTD
4.36%
6M
3.64%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
8.33%

XYLG

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.64%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.25%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTPI vs. XYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WTPI
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
4.36%14.45%17.18%15.53%-10.11%20.94%9.36%
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
7.51%12.93%22.31%18.16%-15.46%23.81%12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between WTPI and XYLG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020

0.80

The correlation between WTPI and XYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTPI vs. XYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTPI
WTPI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLG
XYLG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTPI vs. XYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTPIXYLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.25

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

16.00

-3.81

WTPI vs. XYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the XYLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTPI and XYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTPI vs. XYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTPI drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, which is greater than XYLG's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTPI and XYLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTPIXYLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.40%

-21.30%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-6.93%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-17.42%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

-21.30%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.74%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-4.07%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.40%

+0.11%

Volatility

WTPI vs. XYLG - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTPIXYLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.31%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

8.09%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.27%

9.90%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.21%

14.06%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.26%

13.86%

-0.60%

WTPI vs. XYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTPI has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTPI vs. XYLG - Dividend Comparison

WTPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.05%, less than XYLG's 13.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
WTPI
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.05%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
13.57%13.94%23.65%4.90%6.43%7.40%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTPI and XYLG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYLG has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to WTPI (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTPI dropped -28.40% vs XYLG's -21.30%.

On 5-year performance, XYLG leads with 10.41% vs 9.62% for WTPI. On fees, XYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WTPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XYLG has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 9.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for WTPI.

XYLG has the higher dividend yield at 13.57%, compared with 12.05% for WTPI.

WTPI tracks Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index, while XYLG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for WTPI and 0.35% for XYLG.

XYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTPI and XYLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer