PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTPI vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTPI vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTPI achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.63% return.


WTPI

1D
0.24%
1M
1.80%
YTD
4.51%
6M
4.94%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
8.31%

LQTI

1D
0.47%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.68%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTPI vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTPI and LQTI is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTPI vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTPI
WTPI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTPI vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTPILQTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.19

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.64

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

5.02

+7.79

WTPI vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTPI and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTPILQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.10

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.94

-0.29

Drawdowns

WTPI vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTPI drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTPI and LQTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTPILQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.40%

-3.41%

-24.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-3.41%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.97%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-0.88%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.11%

+0.38%

Volatility

WTPI vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) is 0.86%, while FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that WTPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTPILQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

1.67%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

4.04%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

5.12%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.13%

5.97%

+6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

5.97%

+7.25%

WTPI vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTPI has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTPI vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

WTPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.03%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LQTI
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
9.07%7.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTPI
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.03%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTPI and LQTI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQTI has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to WTPI (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTPI dropped -28.40% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

On 1-year performance, WTPI leads with 19.02% vs 5.55% for LQTI. On fees, WTPI is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, WTPI has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTPI has performed better with a 19.02% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTPI is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.

WTPI has the higher dividend yield at 12.03%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for WTPI and 0.65% for LQTI.

WTPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTPI and LQTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer