PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMU vs. MEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMU vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMU achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than MEAR's 1.02% return.


WTMU

1D
0.12%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.06%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEAR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
1.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMU vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTMU and MEAR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMU vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMU
WTMU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WTMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MEAR
MEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMU vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTMUMEARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.88

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

6.93

-4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

28.45

-22.39

WTMU vs. MEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is lower than the MEAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMU and MEAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTMUMEARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

3.78

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

1.11

-0.08

Drawdowns

WTMU vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMU drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMU and MEAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMUMEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-2.68%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-0.47%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.04%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-0.19%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.11%

+0.85%

Volatility

WTMU vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) at 0.24%. This indicates that WTMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMUMEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.24%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

0.61%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23%

0.86%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.76%

0.98%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

1.52%

+3.24%

WTMU vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTMU and MEAR have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WTMU vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison

WTMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than MEAR's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF
2.84%2.95%3.44%3.30%0.88%0.30%0.90%1.57%1.36%1.01%0.81%0.53%
WTMU
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF
2.98%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMU and MEAR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTMU has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to MEAR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMU dropped -4.24% vs MEAR's -2.68%.

On 1-year performance, WTMU leads with 5.80% vs 3.23% for MEAR. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, MEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTMU has performed better with a 5.80% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMU and MEAR have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

WTMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 2.84% for MEAR.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares.

MEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMU and MEAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer