WTMU vs. IALT
WTMU (WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF) and IALT (iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while IALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. WTMU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IALT.
Performance
WTMU vs. IALT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMU achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than IALT's 13.18% return.
WTMU
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IALT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTMU vs. IALT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTMU WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF | 0.56% | 0.49% |
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 13.18% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMU and IALT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMU vs. IALT — Risk / Return Rank
WTMU
IALT
WTMU vs. IALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTMU | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTMU | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 4.27 | -3.25 |
Drawdowns
WTMU vs. IALT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMU drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, which is greater than IALT's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMU and IALT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMU | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -1.47% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.03% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -0.32% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility
WTMU vs. IALT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMU | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 7.45% | -5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 7.45% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 7.45% | -2.69% |
WTMU vs. IALT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IALT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMU vs. IALT - Dividend Comparison
WTMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than IALT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% |
WTMU WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF | 2.98% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMU and IALT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTMU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTMU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IALT.
WTMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.12% for IALT.
WTMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IALT is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WTMU and 0.99% for IALT.
Find the right allocation for WTMU and IALT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer