WTMU vs. IALT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WTMU (WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF) and IALT (iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while IALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WTMU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IALT.

Performance

WTMU vs. IALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMU achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than IALT's 13.85% return.

WTMU

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.07%
• 6M: -1.35%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.32%

IALT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: 11.00%
• YTD: 13.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF	$40.45M	$35.41M	$114.47M
WTMU WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF	$17.49K	$9.91K	$38.76K

WTMU vs. IALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WTMU WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF	-0.52%	0.51%
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF	13.85%	0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMU and IALT is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

WTMU vs. IALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTMU

WTMU Risk / Return Rank: 42
WTMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
WTMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
WTMU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WTMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
WTMU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

IALT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTMU vs. IALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTMU	IALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	—	—

Drawdowns

WTMU vs. IALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMU drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, which is greater than IALT's maximum drawdown of -2.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMU and IALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTMU	IALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-2.27%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.46%	-0.55%	-1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-0.49%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WTMU	IALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41%	8.01%	-5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.58%	8.01%	-3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.58%	8.01%	-3.43%

WTMU vs. IALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IALT's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTMU vs. IALT - Dividend Comparison

WTMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than IALT's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF	0.39%	0.14%
WTMU WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF	3.23%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTMU and IALT in my portfolio?

WTMU and IALT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTMU or IALT?

On fees, WTMU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTMU or IALT?

WTMU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTMU or IALT?

WTMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.39% for IALT.

What is the main difference between WTMU and IALT?

WTMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IALT is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WTMU and 0.99% for IALT.