PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMU vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMU vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMU achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 9.79% return.


WTMU

1D
0.12%
1M
0.43%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.94%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDE

1D
-1.35%
1M
1.88%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.87%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
46.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMU vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTMU and GDE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMU vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMU
WTMU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WTMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMU vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTMUGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.34

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.36

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

7.34

-1.09

WTMU vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMU and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTMUGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.88

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.15

-0.15

Drawdowns

WTMU vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMU drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, smaller than the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMU and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMUGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-32.01%

+27.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-22.66%

+19.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-11.17%

+9.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-7.88%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

7.26%

-6.30%

Volatility

WTMU vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMU) is 0.74%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that WTMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMUGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

6.65%

-5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

24.24%

-22.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

28.39%

-26.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.76%

26.12%

-21.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

26.12%

-21.36%

WTMU vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WTMU vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

WTMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than GDE's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.94%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%
WTMU
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal ETF
2.98%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMU and GDE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to WTMU (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMU dropped -4.24% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 53.13% vs 5.96% for WTMU. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, WTMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 53.13% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WTMU.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.98% for WTMU.

WTMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WTMU and 0.20% for GDE.

WTMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMU and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer