PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMF vs. WSML.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than WSML.L's 14.98% return.


WTMF

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
7.65%
6M
7.62%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
3.15%

WSML.L

1D
2.86%
1M
2.45%
YTD
14.98%
6M
14.98%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.65%12.17%3.20%16.72%-6.52%9.48%0.48%-2.75%1.20%
WSML.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.98%19.95%7.38%17.11%-18.62%15.23%16.50%24.35%-11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and WSML.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.20

Over the past year, WTMF and WSML.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMF vs. WSML.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

WSML.L
WSML.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WSML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
WSML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTMFWSML.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

3.46

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.53

12.61

+8.92

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the WSML.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and WSML.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum WSML.L drawdown of -41.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and WSML.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMFWSML.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-41.14%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-9.05%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

-20.10%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-30.50%

+17.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.67%

-8.76%

-8.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.49%

-1.55%

Volatility

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 2.76%, while iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMFWSML.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

4.87%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

11.71%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.93%

15.07%

-6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.51%

18.55%

-9.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.10%

19.58%

-11.48%

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WSML.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMF vs. WSML.L - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while WSML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
WSML.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.83%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMF and WSML.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WSML.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WSML.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.

WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while WSML.L is Global Equities. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while WSML.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.35% for WSML.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMF and WSML.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer