PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMF vs. IMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMF vs. IMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than IMF's 13.08% return.


WTMF

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.96%
6M
8.70%
YTD
8.10%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
3.47%
ALL TIME*
1.16%

IMF

1D
0.41%
1M
2.23%
6M
9.83%
YTD
13.08%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$99.09K$127.43K$386.40K
$1.17M$1.17M$1.11M

WTMF vs. IMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and IMF is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMF vs. IMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IMF
IMF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTMF vs. IMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTMFIMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

4.70

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

13.84

+3.03

WTMF vs. IMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the IMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and IMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. IMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than IMF's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and IMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMFIMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-15.29%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-4.54%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.69%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.53%

-7.87%

-9.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.54%

-0.49%

Volatility

WTMF vs. IMF - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) has a higher volatility of 2.19% compared to Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) at 2.08%. This indicates that WTMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMFIMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.08%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

8.95%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

10.65%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.37%

12.17%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.12%

12.17%

-4.05%

WTMF vs. IMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTMF and IMF have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

WTMF vs. IMF - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than IMF's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IMF
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.82%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMF and IMF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTMF has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to IMF (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs IMF's -15.29%.

On 1-year performance, IMF leads with 22.59% vs 18.77% for WTMF. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, IMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IMF has performed better with a 22.59% return vs 18.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMF and IMF have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.89% for IMF.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco.

IMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMF and IMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer