WTMF vs. HOLA
WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMF is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan. WTMF is passively managed, while HOLA is actively managed. Over the past year, WTMF returned 18.77% vs 17.66% for HOLA. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WTMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HOLA.
Performance
WTMF vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than HOLA's 7.29% return.
WTMF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.16%
HOLA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $762.47K | $628.26K | $1.14M | |
| $1.17M | $1.17M | $1.11M |
WTMF vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 8.10% | 9.40% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 7.29% | 7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and HOLA is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMF vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank
WTMF
HOLA
WTMF vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTMF | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | 2.48 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 8.40 | +8.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and HOLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMF | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -6.99% | -23.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.04% | -6.99% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.36% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.53% | -1.40% | -16.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 2.06% | -1.01% |
Volatility
WTMF vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 2.19%, while JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMF | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 3.65% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 8.38% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 10.13% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.37% | 10.15% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.12% | 10.15% | -2.03% |
WTMF vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMF vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, which matches HOLA's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.82% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.82% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMF and HOLA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOLA has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to WTMF (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs HOLA's -6.99%.
On 1-year performance, WTMF leads with 18.77% vs 17.66% for HOLA. On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WTMF has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.
WTMF and HOLA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.82%.
WTMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while HOLA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.50% for HOLA.
WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMF and HOLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer