WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE
WTIC.DE (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and WQTM.DE (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - WTIC.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Optimised Roll Commodity, while WQTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. WTIC.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WQTM.DE.
Performance
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIC.DE achieves a 30.86% return, which is significantly lower than WQTM.DE's 50.87% return.
WTIC.DE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 30.86%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 41.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 50.87%
- 6M
- 44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTIC.DE WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 30.86% | 6.67% |
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 50.87% | 22.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIC.DE and WQTM.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WTIC.DE
WQTM.DE
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WQTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIC.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIC.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 3.21 | -2.67 |
Drawdowns
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.90%, which is greater than WQTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIC.DE and WQTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIC.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.90% | -24.12% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -3.88% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -10.07% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIC.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 39.69% | -21.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 39.69% | -23.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 39.69% | -25.59% |
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIC.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WQTM.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIC.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WTIC.DE nor WQTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WTIC.DE and WQTM.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIC.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIC.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
WTIC.DE is categorized as Commodities, while WQTM.DE is Technology Equities. WTIC.DE tracks Optimised Roll Commodity, while WQTM.DE tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WTIC.DE and 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for WTIC.DE and WQTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer