WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE
WTIC.DE (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - WTIC.DE tracks the Optimised Roll Commodity while UEQU.DE tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTIC.DE returned 12.56%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for UEQU.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WTIC.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UEQU.DE.
Performance
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIC.DE achieves a 30.86% return, which is significantly higher than UEQU.DE's 25.53% return.
WTIC.DE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 30.86%
- 6M
- 31.83%
- 1Y
- 40.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIC.DE WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 30.86% | 3.73% | 9.08% | -9.89% | 18.67% | 39.27% | -8.75% | 10.10% | -5.33% | -7.47% |
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 20.34% | 46.31% | -10.57% | 14.71% | -7.23% | 1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIC.DE and UEQU.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between WTIC.DE and UEQU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WTIC.DE
UEQU.DE
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIC.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.46 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 6.29 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 15.25 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIC.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.60 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.64 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.90%, smaller than the maximum UEQU.DE drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIC.DE and UEQU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIC.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.90% | -30.56% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -6.50% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.51% | -15.66% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -22.44% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -1.21% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -8.92% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.69% | +0.54% |
Volatility
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) at 3.91%. This indicates that WTIC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEQU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIC.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 3.91% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | 13.03% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 15.73% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 16.83% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 16.41% | -2.31% |
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIC.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UEQU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIC.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WTIC.DE nor UEQU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, WTIC.DE and UEQU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UEQU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEQU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WTIC.DE.
WTIC.DE tracks Optimised Roll Commodity, while UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WTIC.DE and 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
Find the right allocation for WTIC.DE and UEQU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer