WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE
WTIC.DE (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ETL2.DE (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - WTIC.DE tracks the Optimised Roll Commodity while ETL2.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTIC.DE returned 12.56%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for ETL2.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WTIC.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ETL2.DE.
Performance
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIC.DE achieves a 30.86% return, which is significantly higher than ETL2.DE's 18.23% return.
WTIC.DE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 30.86%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 41.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
ETL2.DE
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 18.23%
- 6M
- 19.58%
- 1Y
- 28.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIC.DE WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 30.86% | 3.73% | 9.08% | -9.89% | 18.67% | 39.27% | -8.75% | 10.10% | -5.33% | -7.47% |
ETL2.DE L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 18.23% | 4.89% | 11.54% | -9.44% | 24.86% | 46.17% | -7.55% | 10.85% | -4.21% | -9.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIC.DE and ETL2.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2016 | 0.93 |
The correlation between WTIC.DE and ETL2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WTIC.DE
ETL2.DE
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIC.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.33 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 3.59 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 8.20 | +4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIC.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.87 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.90%, smaller than the maximum ETL2.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIC.DE and ETL2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIC.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.90% | -47.04% | +21.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -7.90% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.51% | -15.06% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -23.27% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -3.57% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -21.90% | +9.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.46% | -0.23% |
Volatility
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) at 4.60%. This indicates that WTIC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETL2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIC.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.60% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | 12.74% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 15.15% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 15.44% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 13.69% | +0.41% |
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIC.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ETL2.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIC.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WTIC.DE nor ETL2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, WTIC.DE and ETL2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ETL2.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETL2.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WTIC.DE.
WTIC.DE tracks Optimised Roll Commodity, while ETL2.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WTIC.DE and 0.30% for ETL2.DE.
Find the right allocation for WTIC.DE and ETL2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer