WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WTIC.DE (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and C099.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Commodities funds - WTIC.DE tracks the Optimised Roll Commodity while C099.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTIC.DE returned 13.11%/yr vs 21.14%/yr for C099.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIC.DE achieves a 30.86% return, which is significantly higher than C099.DE's 28.92% return.

WTIC.DE

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 30.86%
• 6M: 32.69%
• 1Y: 41.43%
• 3Y*: 13.11%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: —

C099.DE

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 28.92%
• 6M: 38.05%
• 1Y: 63.83%
• 3Y*: 21.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WTIC.DE WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc	30.86%	3.73%	9.08%	-7.80%
C099.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	28.92%	29.62%	4.85%	-8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIC.DE and C099.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.70

The correlation between WTIC.DE and C099.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIC.DE

WTIC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 73
WTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
WTIC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
WTIC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
WTIC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
WTIC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

C099.DE

C099.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
C099.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
C099.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
C099.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
C099.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
C099.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTIC.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.92	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.47	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.50	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.55	5.06	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.79	17.91	-5.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the C099.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIC.DE and C099.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTIC.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.92	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.85	-0.32

Drawdowns

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIC.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.90%, which is greater than C099.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIC.DE and C099.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIC.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.90%	-15.35%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.43%	-12.55%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.51%	-15.35%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.46%	-4.74%	+1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-6.21%	-5.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	3.55%	-0.32%

Volatility

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTIC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that WTIC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C099.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIC.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	5.09%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.76%	19.66%	-3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	21.77%	-3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	17.90%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.10%	17.90%	-3.80%

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTIC.DE and C099.DE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

WTIC.DE vs. C099.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIC.DE nor C099.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIC.DE and C099.DE in my portfolio?

WTIC.DE and C099.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTIC.DE or C099.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIC.DE or C099.DE?

WTIC.DE and C099.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

What is the main difference between WTIC.DE and C099.DE?

WTIC.DE tracks Optimised Roll Commodity, while C099.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi.