WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE
WTER.DE (WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist) and WQTM.DE (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - WTER.DE is a REIT fund tracking the CenterSquare New Economy Real Estate, while WQTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTER.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WQTM.DE.
Performance
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTER.DE achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly lower than WQTM.DE's 50.87% return.
WTER.DE
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 23.54%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 44.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 50.87%
- 6M
- 44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTER.DE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist | 23.54% | 6.35% |
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 50.87% | 22.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTER.DE and WQTM.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WTER.DE
WQTM.DE
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist (WTER.DE) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WQTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTER.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTER.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 3.21 | -2.84 |
Drawdowns
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTER.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, which is greater than WQTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTER.DE and WQTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTER.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.93% | -24.12% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -3.88% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -10.07% | -6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTER.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 39.69% | -19.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 39.69% | -22.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 39.69% | -22.08% |
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTER.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WQTM.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTER.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
WTER.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while WQTM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTER.DE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.11% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.14% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTER.DE and WQTM.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTER.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTER.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
WTER.DE is categorized as REIT, while WQTM.DE is Technology Equities. WTER.DE tracks CenterSquare New Economy Real Estate, while WQTM.DE tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WTER.DE and 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for WTER.DE and WQTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer