WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WTER.DE (WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist) and CSYZ.DE (CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD) are both REIT funds - WTER.DE tracks the CenterSquare New Economy Real Estate while CSYZ.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTER.DE returned 16.33%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for CSYZ.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTER.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSYZ.DE.

Performance

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist (WTER.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTER.DE achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly higher than CSYZ.DE's 7.36% return.

WTER.DE

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 6.84%
• YTD: 23.54%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: 44.53%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSYZ.DE

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: 0.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WTER.DE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist	23.54%	17.11%	0.49%	9.28%	-17.48%
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	7.36%	-5.02%	2.47%	4.08%	-14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between WTER.DE and CSYZ.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between WTER.DE and CSYZ.DE has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTER.DE

WTER.DE Risk / Return Rank: 64
WTER.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
WTER.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WTER.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
WTER.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
WTER.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CSYZ.DE

CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist (WTER.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTER.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	0.57	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	0.87	+2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.10	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	0.80	+2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.88	2.28	+6.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTER.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTER.DE and CSYZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTER.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	0.57	+1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.26	+0.10

Drawdowns

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTER.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, which is greater than CSYZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTER.DE and CSYZ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTER.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.93%	-31.21%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.49%	-8.07%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.54%	-20.14%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-15.10%	+12.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-13.84%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.00%	2.82%	+2.18%

Volatility

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist (WTER.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) at 2.84%. This indicates that WTER.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSYZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTER.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	2.84%	+4.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	8.54%	+5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.85%	11.29%	+8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	15.03%	+2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.61%	15.22%	+2.39%

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTER.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CSYZ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTER.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

WTER.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than CSYZ.DE's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	1.01%	1.32%	0.00%	0.76%	3.39%	0.21%
WTER.DE WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.11%	1.59%	1.65%	1.14%	0.74%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTER.DE and CSYZ.DE in my portfolio?

WTER.DE and CSYZ.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTER.DE or CSYZ.DE?

On fees, CSYZ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTER.DE or CSYZ.DE?

CSYZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WTER.DE.

What is the main difference between WTER.DE and CSYZ.DE?

WTER.DE tracks CenterSquare New Economy Real Estate, while CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WTER.DE and 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.