WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE
WTEJ.DE (WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc) and WQTM.DE (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds from WisdomTree - WTEJ.DE tracks the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud while WQTM.DE tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTEJ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WQTM.DE.
Performance
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTEJ.DE achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly lower than WQTM.DE's 50.87% return.
WTEJ.DE
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 18.51%
- YTD
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -4.08%
- 1Y
- -10.28%
- 3Y*
- 0.54%
- 5Y*
- -6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 50.87%
- 6M
- 44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WTEJ.DE WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc | -3.77% | 1.40% |
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 50.87% | 22.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTEJ.DE and WQTM.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WTEJ.DE
WQTM.DE
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTEJ.DE) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WQTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTEJ.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTEJ.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 3.21 | -3.09 |
Drawdowns
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.60%, which is greater than WQTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTEJ.DE and WQTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTEJ.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.60% | -24.12% | -39.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.45% | -3.88% | -44.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -10.07% | -25.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.00% | — | — |
Volatility
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTEJ.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.29% | 39.69% | -3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.57% | 39.69% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.61% | 39.69% | -1.08% |
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTEJ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than WQTM.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTEJ.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WTEJ.DE nor WQTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WTEJ.DE and WQTM.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTEJ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTEJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
WTEJ.DE tracks BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud, while WQTM.DE tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WTEJ.DE and 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for WTEJ.DE and WQTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer