WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE
WTEH.DE (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - WTEH.DE tracks the Optimized Roll Commodity (EUR Hedged) while UEQU.DE tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTEH.DE returned 9.32%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for UEQU.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTEH.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UEQU.DE.
Performance
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTEH.DE achieves a 28.87% return, which is significantly higher than UEQU.DE's 25.53% return.
WTEH.DE
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 28.87%
- 6M
- 30.95%
- 1Y
- 40.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTEH.DE WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 28.87% | 14.12% | 1.38% | -8.99% | 8.44% | 27.25% | 5.11% |
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 20.34% | 46.31% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTEH.DE and UEQU.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between WTEH.DE and UEQU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WTEH.DE
UEQU.DE
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (WTEH.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTEH.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.46 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.93 | 6.29 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 15.25 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTEH.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.60 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.85 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.64 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, smaller than the maximum UEQU.DE drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTEH.DE and UEQU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTEH.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -30.56% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -6.50% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.31% | -15.66% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.22% | -22.44% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | -1.21% | -2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -8.92% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.69% | -0.11% |
Volatility
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (WTEH.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) at 3.91%. This indicates that WTEH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEQU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTEH.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 3.91% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 13.03% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.45% | 15.73% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 16.83% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 16.41% | -1.02% |
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTEH.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UEQU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WTEH.DE nor UEQU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WTEH.DE and UEQU.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UEQU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEQU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WTEH.DE.
WTEH.DE tracks Optimized Roll Commodity (EUR Hedged), while UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WTEH.DE and 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
Find the right allocation for WTEH.DE and UEQU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer