WTEC.L vs. AASG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WTEC.L (SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF USD Acc) and AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - WTEC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology index, while AASG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WTEC.L returned 24.26%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for AASG.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTEC.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AASG.L.

Performance

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTEC.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WTEC.L is traded in USD, while AASG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AASG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTEC.L achieves a 24.09% return, which is significantly lower than AASG.L's 30.17% return. Over the past 10 years, WTEC.L has outperformed AASG.L with an annualized return of 24.26%, while AASG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.30% annualized return.

WTEC.L

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 14.02%
• YTD: 24.09%
• 6M: 23.52%
• 1Y: 51.20%
• 3Y*: 32.84%
• 5Y*: 21.34%
• 10Y*: 24.26%

AASG.L

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: 7.08%
• YTD: 30.17%
• 6M: 33.99%
• 1Y: 57.77%
• 3Y*: 26.12%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WTEC.L SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF USD Acc	24.09%	22.22%	34.07%	54.87%	-31.49%	29.89%	44.12%	46.72%	-3.47%	37.86%
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	30.17%	33.18%	12.14%	6.00%	-20.97%	-5.37%	27.84%	19.11%	-16.20%	42.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WTEC.L and AASG.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016	0.61

The correlation between WTEC.L and AASG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTEC.L	AASG.L
Technology	99.1%	44.9%
Communication Services	0.6%	7.1%
Industrials	0.3%	7.8%
Financial Services	0.1%	14.8%
Basic Materials	-	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Energy	-	2.9%
Healthcare	-	3.2%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTEC.L

WTEC.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
WTEC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
WTEC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WTEC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
WTEC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
WTEC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

AASG.L

AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTEC.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTEC.L	AASG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.87	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.78	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.51	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	4.16	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.99	15.79	-6.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTEC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the AASG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTEC.L and AASG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTEC.L	AASG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.87	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.39	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.11	0.57	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.61	+0.52

Drawdowns

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTEC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.96%, smaller than the maximum AASG.L drawdown of -45.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTEC.L and AASG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTEC.L	AASG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.96%	-45.72%	+9.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.86%	-13.82%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-19.25%	-7.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.96%	-41.04%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.96%	-45.72%	+9.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-3.05%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-15.35%	+9.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.68%	3.65%	+2.03%

Volatility

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTEC.L) is 7.53%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that WTEC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AASG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTEC.L	AASG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	8.99%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.83%	17.15%	-1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.41%	20.08%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.52%	20.02%	+3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.89%	19.93%	+1.96%

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTEC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AASG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTEC.L vs. AASG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTEC.L nor AASG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTEC.L and AASG.L in my portfolio?

WTEC.L and AASG.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTEC.L or AASG.L?

On fees, AASG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTEC.L or AASG.L?

AASG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WTEC.L.

What is the main difference between WTEC.L and AASG.L?

WTEC.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while AASG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. WTEC.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology index, while AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WTEC.L and 0.20% for AASG.L.