WSSCX vs. BATVX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WSSCX (Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund) and BATVX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, WSSCX returned 0.72%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for BATVX. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WSSCX charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BATVX.

Performance

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (WSSCX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSSCX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than BATVX's 1.20% return.

WSSCX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.51%
• 6M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 1Y: 1.46%
• 3Y*: 2.32%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: 0.67%
• ALL TIME*: 1.17%

BATVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.04%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 1Y: 2.36%
• 3Y*: 2.36%
• 5Y*: 1.55%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WSSCX Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WSSCX Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund	0.34%	2.95%	2.07%	2.73%	-3.62%	-0.53%
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares	1.20%	2.80%	2.48%	1.41%	-0.10%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WSSCX and BATVX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021	0.21

The correlation between WSSCX and BATVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WSSCX vs. BATVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WSSCX

WSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
WSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
WSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
WSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
WSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
WSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

BATVX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (WSSCX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WSSCX	BATVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	3.57	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	—	—

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the BATVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSSCX and BATVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSSCX drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, which is greater than BATVX's maximum drawdown of -0.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSSCX and BATVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WSSCX	BATVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-0.20%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.02%	0.00%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.65%	-0.10%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.85%	-0.20%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	0.00%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.72%	-0.02%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	0.00%	+0.33%

Volatility

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (WSSCX) has a higher volatility of 0.33% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) at 0.00%. This indicates that WSSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WSSCX	BATVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	0.00%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.89%	0.48%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12%	0.72%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.47%	0.64%	+0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.38%	0.63%	+0.75%

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSSCX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BATVX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

WSSCX vs. BATVX - Dividend Comparison

WSSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than BATVX's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares	2.33%	2.76%	2.44%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WSSCX Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund	1.56%	1.66%	1.62%	1.21%	0.55%	0.28%	0.55%	0.94%	0.77%	0.53%	0.42%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WSSCX and BATVX in my portfolio?

WSSCX and BATVX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WSSCX or BATVX?

WSSCX has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to BATVX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSSCX dropped -6.08% vs BATVX's -0.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.