WSML.L vs. SBUY.L
WSML.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WSML.L tracks the MSCI World Small Cap Index while SBUY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WSML.L returned 6.95%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for SBUY.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WSML.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SBUY.L.
Performance
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WSML.L is traded in USD, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSML.L achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 5.29% return.
WSML.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 32.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SBUY.L
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 13.77% | 19.94% | 7.40% | 17.06% | -18.62% | 15.23% | 16.50% | 24.35% | -12.64% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 5.29% | 30.78% | 12.73% | 15.23% | -11.50% | 20.26% | 11.75% | 30.39% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSML.L and SBUY.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between WSML.L and SBUY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Financial Services
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Technology
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Cyclical
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Healthcare
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Basic Materials
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Real Estate
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Energy
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Defensive
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Communication Services
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Utilities
WSML.L
SBUY.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank
WSML.L
SBUY.L
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSML.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.29 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 11.13 | +1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSML.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.06 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.68 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSML.L drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than SBUY.L's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSML.L and SBUY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSML.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -38.71% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -7.06% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.10% | -16.45% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -27.07% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -1.28% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -5.78% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.09% | +0.39% |
Volatility
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.83%. This indicates that WSML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSML.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 2.83% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 8.39% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 11.28% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 15.85% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 16.80% | +2.80% |
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSML.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSML.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison
WSML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 1.70% | 1.86% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.20% | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.27% |
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSML.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WSML.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WSML.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.
WSML.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index, while SBUY.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WSML.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Find the right allocation for WSML.L and SBUY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer