PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WSML.L is traded in USD, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSML.L achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than MWOZ.L's 9.86% return.


WSML.L

1D
-0.41%
1M
3.09%
YTD
13.77%
6M
15.69%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*

MWOZ.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.26%
YTD
9.86%
6M
11.16%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WSML.L and MWOZ.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025

0.82

The correlation between WSML.L and MWOZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSML.L
WSML.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WSML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WSML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MWOZ.L
MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSML.LMWOZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.04

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

13.24

-0.25

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSML.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSML.L and MWOZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WSML.LMWOZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.31

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.40

-0.93

Drawdowns

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSML.L drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSML.L and MWOZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSML.LMWOZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-17.73%

-23.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.81%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.47%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-2.06%

-6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.02%

+0.46%

Volatility

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that WSML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSML.LMWOZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

2.68%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

8.52%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

11.59%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

15.26%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

15.26%

+4.34%

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSML.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSML.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison

WSML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WSML.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WSML.L.

WSML.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WSML.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSML.L and MWOZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer