WSML.L vs. IWVL.L
WSML.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - WSML.L tracks the MSCI World Small Cap Index while IWVL.L tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WSML.L returned 6.95%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for IWVL.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WSML.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWVL.L.
Performance
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSML.L achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 35.18% return.
WSML.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 32.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IWVL.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 14.91%
- YTD
- 35.18%
- 6M
- 39.74%
- 1Y
- 67.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 13.77% | 19.94% | 7.40% | 17.06% | -18.62% | 15.23% | 16.50% | 24.35% | -12.64% |
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 35.18% | 40.41% | 5.13% | 19.53% | -9.79% | 20.11% | -3.67% | 18.13% | -12.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSML.L and IWVL.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between WSML.L and IWVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Financial Services
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Technology
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Cyclical
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Healthcare
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Basic Materials
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Real Estate
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Energy
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Defensive
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Communication Services
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Utilities
WSML.L
IWVL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
WSML.L
IWVL.L
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSML.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.78 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 7.73 | -4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 29.28 | -16.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSML.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 4.35 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 1.02 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.63 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSML.L drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, roughly equal to the maximum IWVL.L drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSML.L and IWVL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSML.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -39.30% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -8.74% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.10% | -14.46% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -26.55% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.26% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -7.51% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.31% | +0.17% |
Volatility
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) is 4.42%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that WSML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSML.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 6.53% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 12.92% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 15.55% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 16.05% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 17.02% | +2.58% |
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSML.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSML.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WSML.L nor IWVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WSML.L and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WSML.L.
WSML.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WSML.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.
Find the right allocation for WSML.L and IWVL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer