PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSMDX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSMDX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSMDX achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WSMDX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.02%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.


WSMDX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.85%
YTD
14.00%
6M
11.72%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
13.02%

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSMDX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSMDX
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
14.00%0.63%27.55%18.14%-22.98%8.28%32.38%30.81%-2.18%28.85%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between WSMDX and VGT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.81

The correlation between WSMDX and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSMDX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSMDX
WSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
WSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSMDX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSMDXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.87

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

8.76

-0.19

WSMDX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSMDX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSMDX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSMDX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSMDXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.33%

-54.63%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-16.40%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-27.23%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.89%

-35.07%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-35.07%

-1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.71%

+7.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-7.95%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

5.36%

-2.21%

Volatility

WSMDX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) is 6.45%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that WSMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSMDXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

11.39%

-4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

18.58%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.05%

22.72%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.16%

25.55%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.00%

24.77%

-2.77%

WSMDX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSMDX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

WSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
WSMDX
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.46%2.81%24.90%7.89%3.34%9.30%1.66%7.13%8.88%5.33%2.64%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSMDX and VGT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to WSMDX (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSMDX dropped -50.33% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSMDX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer