WSCR.L vs. BATG.L
WSCR.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WSCR.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while BATG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WSCR.L returned 10.26%/yr vs 24.89%/yr for BATG.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WSCR.L charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATG.L.
Performance
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSCR.L achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly lower than BATG.L's 34.23% return.
WSCR.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATG.L
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 34.23%
- 6M
- 39.36%
- 1Y
- 129.36%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- —
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSCR.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 7.26% | 8.66% | 5.56% | 10.48% | -8.17% | 1.32% |
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 34.23% | 60.42% | 0.47% | 2.83% | -3.91% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSCR.L and BATG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between WSCR.L and BATG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WSCR.L
BATG.L
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Industrials
WSCR.L
BATG.L
Financial Services
WSCR.L
BATG.L
-
Technology
WSCR.L
BATG.L
Consumer Cyclical
WSCR.L
BATG.L
Healthcare
WSCR.L
BATG.L
-
Real Estate
WSCR.L
BATG.L
-
Basic Materials
WSCR.L
BATG.L
Consumer Defensive
WSCR.L
BATG.L
-
Energy
WSCR.L
BATG.L
-
Communication Services
WSCR.L
BATG.L
-
Utilities
WSCR.L
BATG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank
WSCR.L
BATG.L
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (WSCR.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSCR.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.66 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 9.45 | -7.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 32.41 | -23.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSCR.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 4.61 | -2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.80 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSCR.L drawdown since its inception was -22.10%, smaller than the maximum BATG.L drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSCR.L and BATG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSCR.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -33.37% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -13.61% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.10% | -33.37% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.18% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -8.99% | +2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 3.98% | -1.59% |
Volatility
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (WSCR.L) is 3.16%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that WSCR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSCR.L | BATG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 10.12% | -6.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 22.09% | -13.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 27.90% | -15.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 22.54% | -6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 22.86% | -7.07% |
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSCR.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSCR.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison
WSCR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while BATG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSCR.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.82% | 1.59% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSCR.L and BATG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WSCR.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WSCR.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.
WSCR.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. WSCR.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for WSCR.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.
Find the right allocation for WSCR.L and BATG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer