WRPIX vs. BAMBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WRPIX (Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund) and BAMBX (BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, WRPIX returned 7.21%/yr vs 3.05%/yr for BAMBX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WRPIX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for BAMBX.

Performance

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRPIX achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than BAMBX's -0.77% return.

WRPIX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 20.54%
• 3Y*: 8.24%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: —

BAMBX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: -0.77%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 1.08%
• 3Y*: 5.70%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: 4.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund	10.67%	5.37%	11.23%	-0.06%	10.44%	6.84%	-16.77%	-2.86%
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund	-0.77%	4.59%	6.61%	6.19%	-3.23%	5.84%	3.34%	5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between WRPIX and BAMBX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019	0.03

Return for Risk

WRPIX vs. BAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRPIX

WRPIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
WRPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
WRPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
WRPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
WRPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
WRPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

BAMBX

BAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRPIX	BAMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	0.21	+2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.41	0.34	+4.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.04	+0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.28	0.17	+7.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.51	0.47	+25.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRPIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the BAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRPIX and BAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRPIX	BAMBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06	0.21	+2.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	0.83	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.26	-0.85

Drawdowns

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRPIX drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, which is greater than BAMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRPIX and BAMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRPIX	BAMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.67%	-8.84%	-12.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-5.19%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.72%	-5.19%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.72%	-6.66%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-8.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-4.82%	+4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-1.25%	-6.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	1.89%	-1.09%

Volatility

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) at 1.26%. This indicates that WRPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRPIX	BAMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	1.26%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.26%	3.37%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.65%	4.16%	+2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.13%	3.67%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.08%	3.60%	+3.48%

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRPIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMBX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRPIX vs. BAMBX - Dividend Comparison

WRPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than BAMBX's 1.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund	1.98%	1.97%	3.86%	4.13%	4.70%	2.39%	1.09%	3.73%	8.70%	3.81%	4.82%
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund	6.47%	7.16%	3.25%	4.66%	15.23%	0.00%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRPIX and BAMBX in my portfolio?

WRPIX and BAMBX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRPIX or BAMBX?

WRPIX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to BAMBX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRPIX dropped -21.67% vs BAMBX's -8.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.