WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WRNA.DE (WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc) and 4COP.DE (Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - WRNA.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree BioRevolution ESG Screened, while 4COP.DE is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WRNA.DE returned 0.92%/yr vs 34.58%/yr for 4COP.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WRNA.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for 4COP.DE.

Performance

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRNA.DE achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than 4COP.DE's 24.89% return.

WRNA.DE

• 1D: 4.08%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 48.70%
• 3Y*: 0.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

4COP.DE

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 15.31%
• YTD: 24.89%
• 6M: 36.74%
• 1Y: 112.94%
• 3Y*: 34.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WRNA.DE WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.48%	9.13%	-10.92%	-3.37%	-22.01%	-0.98%
4COP.DE Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	24.89%	73.62%	9.38%	4.93%	6.78%	0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WRNA.DE and 4COP.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021	0.36

Return for Risk

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRNA.DE

WRNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 56
WRNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
WRNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
WRNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
WRNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
WRNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

4COP.DE

4COP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
4COP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
4COP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
4COP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
4COP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRNA.DE	4COP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.91	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	3.37	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	4.28	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.63	13.68	-4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRNA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the 4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRNA.DE and 4COP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRNA.DE	4COP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	2.91	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.20	0.73	-0.93

Drawdowns

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.35%, which is greater than 4COP.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRNA.DE and 4COP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRNA.DE	4COP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.35%	-39.12%	-13.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.42%	-26.21%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.06%	-39.12%	-0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.73%	-5.17%	-15.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.26%	-14.66%	-12.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	8.22%	-3.18%

Volatility

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE) is 6.73%, while Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) has a volatility of 13.96%. This indicates that WRNA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4COP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRNA.DE	4COP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	13.96%	-7.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.21%	33.13%	-15.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.70%	38.63%	-10.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.22%	32.97%	-8.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.22%	32.97%	-8.75%

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRNA.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than 4COP.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRNA.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WRNA.DE nor 4COP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRNA.DE and 4COP.DE in my portfolio?

WRNA.DE and 4COP.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WRNA.DE or 4COP.DE?

On fees, WRNA.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRNA.DE or 4COP.DE?

WRNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for 4COP.DE.

What is the main difference between WRNA.DE and 4COP.DE?

WRNA.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while 4COP.DE is Commodity Producers Equities. WRNA.DE tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution ESG Screened, while 4COP.DE tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WRNA.DE and 0.55% for 4COP.DE.