WRN vs. REMX
WRN (Western Copper and Gold Corporation) is a stock, while REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Over the past 10 years, WRN returned 12.05%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for REMX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WRN vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRN achieves a -12.73% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 31.62% return. Over the past 10 years, WRN has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 12.05%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.
WRN
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -14.34%
- YTD
- -12.73%
- 6M
- -17.67%
- 1Y
- 89.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
REMX
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 31.62%
- 6M
- 30.92%
- 1Y
- 155.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
WRN vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRN Western Copper and Gold Corporation | -12.73% | 154.29% | -21.05% | -25.28% | 14.10% | 26.83% | 50.00% | 82.22% | -55.45% | -26.81% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 31.62% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRN and REMX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between WRN and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRN vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
WRN
REMX
WRN vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Copper and Gold Corporation (WRN) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRN | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 6.71 | -4.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 17.79 | -13.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRN vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRN drawdown since its inception was -95.24%, which is greater than REMX's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRN and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRN | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.24% | -90.20% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.44% | -23.35% | -21.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.15% | -62.11% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.92% | -73.34% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.12% | -73.34% | -6.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.06% | -55.45% | +10.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.36% | -66.82% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.05% | 8.79% | +11.26% |
Volatility
WRN vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
Western Copper and Gold Corporation (WRN) has a higher volatility of 23.05% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 15.65%. This indicates that WRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRN | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.05% | 15.65% | +7.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.63% | 36.86% | +19.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.89% | 49.70% | +18.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.02% | 40.64% | +16.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.03% | 37.15% | +24.88% |
Dividends
WRN vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
WRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.34% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
WRN Western Copper and Gold Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRN and REMX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WRN has higher volatility (23.05%) compared to REMX (15.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRN dropped -95.24% vs REMX's -90.20%.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRN and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer