WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) and UETW.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both Global Equities funds - WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100 while UETW.DE tracks the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WRLD.DE returned 10.05%/yr vs 17.68%/yr for UETW.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRLD.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for UETW.DE.

Performance

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRLD.DE achieves a 18.45% return, which is significantly higher than UETW.DE's 10.95% return.

WRLD.DE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 18.45%
• 6M: 19.64%
• 1Y: 28.36%
• 3Y*: 10.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UETW.DE

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 4.88%
• YTD: 10.95%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 23.88%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF	18.45%	11.71%	1.59%	11.63%	-16.39%	8.00%
UETW.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc	10.95%	8.06%	26.50%	19.68%	-13.72%	10.07%

Correlation

The correlation between WRLD.DE and UETW.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.78

The correlation between WRLD.DE and UETW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRLD.DE

WRLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
WRLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WRLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
WRLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
WRLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

UETW.DE

UETW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
UETW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
UETW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
UETW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
UETW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
UETW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRLD.DE	UETW.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.17	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.02	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	3.67	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	14.61	-3.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the UETW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD.DE and UETW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRLD.DE	UETW.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.17	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.85	-0.47

Drawdowns

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum UETW.DE drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD.DE and UETW.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRLD.DE	UETW.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.55%	-33.72%	+10.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-6.47%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-21.30%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.30%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.51%	-4.63%	-4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	1.63%	+0.87%

Volatility

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) at 2.60%. This indicates that WRLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UETW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRLD.DE	UETW.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	2.60%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.34%	7.63%	+3.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.81%	10.97%	+3.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	14.03%	+2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	16.11%	+0.87%

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRLD.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than UETW.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRLD.DE vs. UETW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WRLD.DE nor UETW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRLD.DE and UETW.DE in my portfolio?

WRLD.DE and UETW.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WRLD.DE or UETW.DE?

On fees, UETW.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRLD.DE or UETW.DE?

UETW.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.

What is the main difference between WRLD.DE and UETW.DE?

WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100, while UETW.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for WRLD.DE and 0.10% for UETW.DE.