WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) and EXI2.DE (iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)) are both Global Equities funds - WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100 while EXI2.DE tracks the Dow Jones Global Titans 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WRLD.DE returned 10.05%/yr vs 22.85%/yr for EXI2.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRLD.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for EXI2.DE.

Performance

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRLD.DE achieves a 18.45% return, which is significantly higher than EXI2.DE's 12.23% return.

WRLD.DE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 18.45%
• 6M: 18.65%
• 1Y: 26.89%
• 3Y*: 10.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EXI2.DE

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 12.23%
• 6M: 11.81%
• 1Y: 32.96%
• 3Y*: 22.85%
• 5Y*: 17.19%
• 10Y*: 16.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF	18.45%	11.71%	1.59%	11.63%	-16.39%	8.00%
EXI2.DE iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)	12.23%	10.38%	38.84%	33.44%	-21.53%	11.51%

Correlation

The correlation between WRLD.DE and EXI2.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.63

The correlation between WRLD.DE and EXI2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRLD.DE

WRLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
WRLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WRLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
WRLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
WRLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

EXI2.DE

EXI2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EXI2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EXI2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EXI2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EXI2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRLD.DE	EXI2.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.52	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.40	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.44	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	4.21	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	15.84	-4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD.DE and EXI2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRLD.DE	EXI2.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.52	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.41	-0.03

Drawdowns

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum EXI2.DE drawdown of -59.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD.DE and EXI2.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRLD.DE	EXI2.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.55%	-59.21%	+35.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-8.07%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-24.75%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-1.11%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.51%	-17.44%	+7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	2.15%	+0.35%

Volatility

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) at 3.46%. This indicates that WRLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXI2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRLD.DE	EXI2.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	3.46%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.34%	9.18%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.81%	13.50%	+1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	16.60%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	16.57%	+0.41%

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRLD.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EXI2.DE's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRLD.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Dividend Comparison

WRLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXI2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXI2.DE iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)	0.33%	0.41%	0.42%	0.61%	0.84%	0.55%	0.99%	1.28%	1.29%	2.56%	1.77%	2.56%
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRLD.DE and EXI2.DE in my portfolio?

WRLD.DE and EXI2.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WRLD.DE or EXI2.DE?

On fees, EXI2.DE is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRLD.DE or EXI2.DE?

EXI2.DE is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.

What is the main difference between WRLD.DE and EXI2.DE?

WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100, while EXI2.DE tracks Dow Jones Global Titans 50. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for WRLD.DE and 0.51% for EXI2.DE.