PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

WRLD.AX (Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF) and IHOO.AX (iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WRLD.AX is actively managed, while IHOO.AX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WRLD.AX returned 10.04%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for IHOO.AX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) and iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF (IHOO.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRLD.AX achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than IHOO.AX's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, WRLD.AX has underperformed IHOO.AX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while IHOO.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.25% annualized return.

WRLD.AX

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.32%
6M
3.52%
YTD
4.57%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
10.04%

IHOO.AX

1D
0.87%
1M
0.91%
6M
9.21%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
15.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRLD.AX
Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF		4.57%9.59%29.10%13.20%-10.32%23.66%-3.31%22.48%-0.50%10.96%
IHOO.AX
iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF		10.69%24.02%27.67%24.45%-16.15%26.46%12.48%28.93%-5.87%20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between WRLD.AX and IHOO.AX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2015

0.50

The correlation between WRLD.AX and IHOO.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF

iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WRLD.AX
WRLD.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WRLD.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRLD.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
IHOO.AX
IHOO.AX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IHOO.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHOO.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHOO.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IHOO.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHOO.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) and iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF (IHOO.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

WRLD.AXIHOO.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.46
1.88

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.08
2.57

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.93

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

10.75

-6.74

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRLD.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the IHOO.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD.AX and IHOO.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRLD.AX drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, smaller than the maximum IHOO.AX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD.AX and IHOO.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WRLD.AXIHOO.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.14%

-33.91%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-9.58%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-21.25%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.47%

-22.19%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.14%

-33.91%

+17.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-1.67%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.26%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.65%

+0.61%

Volatility

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) is 1.76%, while iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF (IHOO.AX) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that WRLD.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHOO.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WRLD.AXIHOO.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

3.89%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

12.11%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

14.98%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

17.93%

-6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.00%

17.85%

-6.85%

Dividends

WRLD.AX vs. IHOO.AX - Dividend Comparison

WRLD.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IHOO.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHOO.AX
iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF		4.46%0.70%0.87%1.44%1.68%16.51%2.57%2.33%8.40%11.15%0.53%1.75%
WRLD.AX
Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%4.66%0.00%0.00%1.66%0.90%0.00%0.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WRLD.AX and IHOO.AX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRLD.AX and IHOO.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer