PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRGCX vs. KSCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRGCX achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than KSCOX's 17.73% return. Over the past 10 years, WRGCX has underperformed KSCOX with an annualized return of 11.18%, while KSCOX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.27% annualized return.


WRGCX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.81%
6M
11.03%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
11.18%

KSCOX

1D
0.37%
1M
-7.02%
YTD
17.73%
6M
13.43%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
25.90%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
19.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
12.81%12.23%27.78%12.42%-28.46%1.22%37.76%22.89%-4.54%22.67%
KSCOX
Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund
17.73%-8.66%68.42%-14.77%31.96%50.32%2.30%27.06%0.29%26.23%

Correlation

The correlation between WRGCX and KSCOX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2000

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between WRGCX and KSCOX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRGCX vs. KSCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRGCX
WRGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WRGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WRGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

KSCOX
KSCOX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KSCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KSCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRGCXKSCOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

0.20

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

0.45

+1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.28

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.95

0.63

+8.32

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the KSCOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRGCX and KSCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRGCXKSCOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.20

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.52

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.74

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.58

-0.40

Drawdowns

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRGCX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, smaller than the maximum KSCOX drawdown of -70.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRGCX and KSCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRGCXKSCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-70.09%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-18.82%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-33.10%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

-33.10%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

-47.09%

-11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.82%

-19.24%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.34%

-14.89%

-6.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

8.24%

-5.21%

Volatility

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) is 5.39%, while Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that WRGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRGCXKSCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

6.04%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

21.67%

-6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

25.88%

-5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.95%

27.83%

+15.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.74%

26.13%

+8.61%

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRGCX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than KSCOX's 1.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRGCX vs. KSCOX - Dividend Comparison

WRGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, more than KSCOX's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KSCOX
Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund
0.15%0.18%3.58%6.71%0.00%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
11.08%12.50%23.68%9.47%9.84%63.80%12.83%9.29%23.45%13.88%7.73%18.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRGCX and KSCOX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSCOX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to WRGCX (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRGCX dropped -58.56% vs KSCOX's -70.09%.

WRGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRGCX and KSCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer