PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRGCX vs. JATTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRGCX achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than JATTX's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, WRGCX has outperformed JATTX with an annualized return of 11.18%, while JATTX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.


WRGCX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.81%
6M
11.03%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
11.18%

JATTX

1D
0.03%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.37%
6M
11.06%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
12.81%12.23%27.78%12.42%-28.46%1.22%37.76%22.89%-4.54%22.67%
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
11.37%9.54%10.30%14.52%-23.75%6.63%28.41%28.30%-5.25%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between WRGCX and JATTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2005

0.93

The correlation between WRGCX and JATTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRGCX vs. JATTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRGCX
WRGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WRGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WRGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JATTX
JATTX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JATTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JATTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JATTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JATTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JATTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRGCXJATTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.66

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

2.43

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.41

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.95

9.91

-0.96

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the JATTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRGCX and JATTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRGCXJATTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.66

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.21

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.49

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.52

-0.34

Drawdowns

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRGCX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, roughly equal to the maximum JATTX drawdown of -57.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRGCX and JATTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRGCXJATTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-57.77%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-11.09%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-23.90%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

-31.90%

-26.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

-39.71%

-18.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.82%

-1.04%

-18.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.34%

-8.77%

-12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.69%

+0.34%

Volatility

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) have volatilities of 5.39% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRGCXJATTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

5.24%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

12.41%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

16.06%

+4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.95%

19.61%

+23.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.74%

20.58%

+14.16%

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRGCX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JATTX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRGCX vs. JATTX - Dividend Comparison

WRGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, more than JATTX's 10.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
10.36%11.54%7.74%7.29%6.35%20.71%4.17%4.30%7.56%5.11%2.83%7.89%
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
11.08%12.50%23.68%9.47%9.84%63.80%12.83%9.29%23.45%13.88%7.73%18.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRGCX and JATTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRGCX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to JATTX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRGCX dropped -58.56% vs JATTX's -57.77%.

JATTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRGCX and JATTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer