PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRGCX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRGCX achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 85.56% return. Over the past 10 years, WRGCX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.21% annualized return.


WRGCX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.27%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.05%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
11.16%

FSELX

1D
6.35%
1M
26.53%
YTD
85.56%
6M
83.27%
1Y
166.37%
3Y*
68.85%
5Y*
46.95%
10Y*
39.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
12.55%12.23%27.78%12.42%-28.46%1.22%37.76%22.89%-4.54%22.67%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
85.56%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between WRGCX and FSELX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 1992

0.73

The correlation between WRGCX and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRGCX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRGCX
WRGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WRGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WRGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRGCXFSELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

5.35

-3.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

5.23

-3.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.71

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

12.18

-9.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.08

46.77

-37.69

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRGCX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRGCXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

5.35

-3.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.21

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

1.12

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.55

-0.36

Drawdowns

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRGCX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRGCX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRGCXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-82.54%

+23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-14.38%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-36.31%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

-46.37%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

-46.37%

-12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.01%

0.00%

-20.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.34%

-28.70%

+7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.74%

-0.71%

Volatility

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) is 5.40%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that WRGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRGCXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

12.01%

-6.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

25.42%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

32.74%

-12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.95%

38.97%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.74%

35.07%

-0.33%

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRGCX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRGCX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

WRGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%, more than FSELX's 8.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
8.83%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
11.10%12.50%23.68%9.47%9.84%63.80%12.83%9.29%23.45%13.88%7.73%18.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRGCX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to WRGCX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRGCX dropped -58.56% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRGCX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer