WRGCX vs. AVALX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WRGCX (Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund) and AVALX (Aegis Value Fund) are both mutual funds - WRGCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Ivy Funds, while AVALX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Aegis. Over the past 10 years, WRGCX returned 11.18%/yr vs 20.56%/yr for AVALX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRGCX charges 1.89%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for AVALX.

Performance

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRGCX achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than AVALX's 21.92% return. Over the past 10 years, WRGCX has underperformed AVALX with an annualized return of 11.18%, while AVALX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.56% annualized return.

WRGCX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 4.72%
• 10Y*: 11.18%

AVALX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 21.92%
• 6M: 24.36%
• 1Y: 58.85%
• 3Y*: 34.33%
• 5Y*: 21.88%
• 10Y*: 20.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRGCX Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund	12.81%	12.23%	27.78%	12.42%	-28.46%	1.22%	37.76%	22.89%	-4.54%	22.67%
AVALX Aegis Value Fund	21.92%	67.06%	8.29%	13.11%	10.50%	37.67%	18.89%	25.67%	-16.95%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between WRGCX and AVALX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 1998	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between WRGCX and AVALX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WRGCX vs. AVALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRGCX

WRGCX Risk / Return Rank: 29
WRGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
WRGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
WRGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
WRGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
WRGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

AVALX

AVALX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRGCX	AVALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	3.66	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	4.43	-2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.62	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	7.34	-5.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	25.89	-16.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the AVALX Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRGCX and AVALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRGCX	AVALX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	3.66	-2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.99	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.93	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.54	-0.35

Drawdowns

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRGCX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, smaller than the maximum AVALX drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRGCX and AVALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRGCX	AVALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.56%	-73.72%	+15.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.25%	-8.32%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.30%	-13.59%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.56%	-32.00%	-26.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.56%	-48.34%	-10.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.82%	-0.64%	-19.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.34%	-10.95%	-10.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	2.35%	+0.68%

Volatility

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Aegis Value Fund (AVALX) at 3.09%. This indicates that WRGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRGCX	AVALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	3.09%	+2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.96%	12.61%	+2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.06%	16.77%	+3.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.95%	22.22%	+20.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.74%	22.17%	+12.57%

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRGCX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than AVALX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRGCX vs. AVALX - Dividend Comparison

WRGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, more than AVALX's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVALX Aegis Value Fund	1.92%	2.34%	7.07%	2.23%	0.16%	0.00%	6.62%	2.36%	6.18%	0.00%	1.45%	0.04%
WRGCX Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund	11.08%	12.50%	23.68%	9.47%	9.84%	63.80%	12.83%	9.29%	23.45%	13.88%	7.73%	18.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRGCX and AVALX in my portfolio?

WRGCX and AVALX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRGCX or AVALX?

WRGCX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to AVALX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRGCX dropped -58.56% vs AVALX's -73.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.