PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPS vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WPS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPS
iShares International Developed Property ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.59%7.43%-24.74%9.05%-5.36%20.34%-9.03%22.86%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between WPS and GLD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2007

0.16

WPS vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WPS
GLD

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

WPS
100.0%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

WPS

-

GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

WPS

-

GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

WPS

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

WPS

-

GLD

-

Energy

WPS

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

WPS

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

WPS

-

GLD

-

Industrials

WPS

-

GLD

-

Technology

WPS

-

GLD

-

Utilities

WPS

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPS

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WPS vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPSGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

Drawdowns

WPS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPSGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

Volatility

WPS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPSGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

WPS vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither WPS nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPS
iShares International Developed Property ETF
0.00%0.00%2.48%2.38%2.63%4.36%2.31%6.81%4.45%4.31%5.73%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPS and GLD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for WPS.

WPS and GLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

WPS is categorized as REIT, while GLD is Gold. WPS tracks S&P Developed ex US Property Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for WPS and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPS and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer