PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPLCX vs. FLCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund (WPLCX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, WPLCX has underperformed FLCCX with an annualized return of 8.06%, while FLCCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


WPLCX

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.32%
YTD
9.39%
6M
10.92%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
8.06%

FLCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPLCX
WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund
9.39%16.54%19.35%25.92%-35.46%22.54%-22.55%52.10%-16.58%23.73%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
0.00%18.58%25.08%22.21%-8.85%24.54%7.70%30.36%-9.25%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between WPLCX and FLCCX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2013

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between WPLCX and FLCCX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPLCX vs. FLCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPLCX
WPLCX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WPLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WPLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCCX
FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund (WPLCX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPLCXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

1.73

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

2.43

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.73

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.12

4.65

+2.47

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FLCCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPLCX and FLCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPLCXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.73

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.71

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.72

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.43

-0.22

Drawdowns

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPLCX drawdown since its inception was -66.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCCX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPLCX and FLCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPLCXFLCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.21%

-65.81%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-5.10%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.09%

-19.06%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.93%

-22.04%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.21%

-37.63%

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-4.23%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-15.48%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

2.82%

+1.09%

Volatility

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Volatility Comparison

WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund (WPLCX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that WPLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPLCXFLCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

0.00%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

4.21%

+10.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

8.06%

+8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.97%

16.44%

+9.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.16%

18.59%

+13.57%

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPLCX has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCCX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPLCX vs. FLCCX - Dividend Comparison

WPLCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
6.79%6.79%6.81%3.27%1.77%6.87%5.44%8.90%18.35%7.06%1.65%2.52%
WPLCX
WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.74%2.41%0.11%2.56%0.18%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPLCX and FLCCX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPLCX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPLCX dropped -66.21% vs FLCCX's -65.81%.

FLCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPLCX and FLCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer