PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPGTX vs. BPLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WPG Partners Small/Micro Cap Value Fund (WPGTX) and Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class (BPLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPGTX achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly higher than BPLSX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, WPGTX has underperformed BPLSX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while BPLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


WPGTX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.14%
YTD
16.68%
6M
17.57%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
9.82%

BPLSX

1D
1.56%
1M
2.27%
YTD
11.69%
6M
14.84%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
32.98%
5Y*
22.32%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPGTX
WPG Partners Small/Micro Cap Value Fund
16.68%7.08%10.53%14.45%2.10%40.04%-1.31%23.35%-21.88%5.58%
BPLSX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class
11.69%28.28%43.67%15.23%7.22%32.04%-5.68%9.22%-15.47%2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between WPGTX and BPLSX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 1998

0.48

Over the past year, WPGTX and BPLSX have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPGTX vs. BPLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPGTX
WPGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WPGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
WPGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BPLSX
BPLSX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BPLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BPLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WPG Partners Small/Micro Cap Value Fund (WPGTX) and Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class (BPLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPGTXBPLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

3.35

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

5.17

-2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.62

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

6.75

-3.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.93

24.51

-13.58

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the BPLSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPGTX and BPLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPGTXBPLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

3.35

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.81

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.56

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.65

-0.18

Drawdowns

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPGTX drawdown since its inception was -60.60%, which is greater than BPLSX's maximum drawdown of -43.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPGTX and BPLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPGTXBPLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.60%

-43.20%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-5.23%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.90%

-24.58%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-24.58%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.03%

-37.28%

-12.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-6.31%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.44%

+1.47%

Volatility

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Volatility Comparison

WPG Partners Small/Micro Cap Value Fund (WPGTX) and Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class (BPLSX) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPGTXBPLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.09%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

8.23%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

10.47%

+5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

27.82%

-8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

22.94%

-0.49%

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPGTX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BPLSX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPGTX vs. BPLSX - Dividend Comparison

WPGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than BPLSX's 7.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPLSX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund Institutional Class
7.10%7.93%44.35%22.61%12.63%4.36%38.62%10.22%8.85%0.76%0.00%9.19%
WPGTX
WPG Partners Small/Micro Cap Value Fund
8.70%10.15%6.38%7.58%17.82%1.47%0.64%0.44%8.44%6.83%0.42%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPGTX and BPLSX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPGTX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to BPLSX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPGTX dropped -60.60% vs BPLSX's -43.20%.

BPLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPGTX and BPLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer