PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WOSC.L is traded in GBP, while MVOL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MVOL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOSC.L achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly higher than MVOL.L's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, WOSC.L has outperformed MVOL.L with an annualized return of 10.89%, while MVOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.


WOSC.L

1D
0.61%
1M
4.16%
YTD
14.25%
6M
14.68%
1Y
33.55%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.89%

MVOL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
1.69%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.74%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
14.25%11.76%9.41%9.96%-8.76%16.26%12.23%22.09%-9.72%11.06%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
1.07%3.11%13.02%1.92%1.12%15.73%-0.45%17.90%3.39%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WOSC.L and MVOL.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2013

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between WOSC.L and MVOL.L has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WOSC.L
MVOL.L

Industrials

20.5%
9.2%

Financial Services

13.6%
14.0%

Technology

13.4%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
5.6%

Healthcare

9.5%
13.8%

Basic Materials

8.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

8.2%
0.7%

Energy

5.6%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
10.9%

Communication Services

3.0%
12.1%

Utilities

2.8%
8.0%

Industrials

WOSC.L
20.5%
MVOL.L
9.2%

Financial Services

WOSC.L
13.6%
MVOL.L
14.0%

Technology

WOSC.L
13.4%
MVOL.L
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WOSC.L
10.9%
MVOL.L
5.6%

Healthcare

WOSC.L
9.5%
MVOL.L
13.8%

Basic Materials

WOSC.L
8.2%
MVOL.L
1.1%

Real Estate

WOSC.L
8.2%
MVOL.L
0.7%

Energy

WOSC.L
5.6%
MVOL.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

WOSC.L
4.2%
MVOL.L
10.9%

Communication Services

WOSC.L
3.0%
MVOL.L
12.1%

Utilities

WOSC.L
2.8%
MVOL.L
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOSC.LMVOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.05

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

0.41

+3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.37

1.06

+15.31

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOSC.L and MVOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOSC.LMVOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

0.27

+2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.59

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.63

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.79

-0.25

Drawdowns

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOSC.L drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than MVOL.L's maximum drawdown of -20.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOSC.L and MVOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOSC.LMVOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-20.24%

-15.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-5.89%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-8.78%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.43%

-10.44%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-20.24%

-15.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.42%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-3.64%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.29%

-0.25%

Volatility

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that WOSC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOSC.LMVOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

2.89%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

6.88%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

8.81%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

10.63%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.88%

12.49%

+8.39%

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOSC.L vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WOSC.L nor MVOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WOSC.L and MVOL.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVOL.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVOL.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.

WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WOSC.L and 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOSC.L and MVOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer