PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOSC.L achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than ERN1.L's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, WOSC.L has outperformed ERN1.L with an annualized return of 10.99%, while ERN1.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.


WOSC.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.77%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.73%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
10.99%

ERN1.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-1.94%
1Y
1.46%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
13.56%11.76%9.41%9.96%-8.76%16.26%12.23%22.09%-9.72%11.06%
ERN1.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
-0.83%5.12%-4.27%72.37%5.26%-6.83%5.64%-4.76%0.45%3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between WOSC.L and ERN1.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2013

0.08

The correlation between WOSC.L and ERN1.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.12 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ERN1.L
ERN1.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ERN1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOSC.LERN1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.06

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

0.43

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.10

0.84

+15.26

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the ERN1.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOSC.L and ERN1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOSC.LERN1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

0.33

+2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.36

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.30

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.40

+0.14

Drawdowns

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOSC.L drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than ERN1.L's maximum drawdown of -11.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOSC.L and ERN1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOSC.LERN1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-11.79%

-24.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-3.41%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-6.78%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.43%

-6.78%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-11.79%

-24.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.79%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-4.52%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.74%

+0.30%

Volatility

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L) at 1.19%. This indicates that WOSC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERN1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOSC.LERN1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

1.19%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

2.95%

+6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

4.35%

+8.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

33.29%

-17.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.88%

24.28%

-3.40%

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ERN1.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOSC.L vs. ERN1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WOSC.L nor ERN1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERN1.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%41.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.00%13.08%
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WOSC.L and ERN1.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERN1.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERN1.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.

WOSC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ERN1.L is Ultrashort Bond. WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while ERN1.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WOSC.L and 0.09% for ERN1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOSC.L and ERN1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer