PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOSC.L vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WOSC.L is traded in GBP, while DBC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBC values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOSC.L achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 34.17% return. Over the past 10 years, WOSC.L has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 10.89%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.


WOSC.L

1D
0.61%
1M
4.16%
YTD
14.25%
6M
14.68%
1Y
33.55%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.89%

DBC

1D
-1.35%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
34.17%
6M
32.26%
1Y
45.86%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
14.25%11.76%9.41%9.96%-8.76%16.26%12.23%22.09%-9.72%11.06%
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
34.17%0.40%3.97%-10.88%33.53%42.70%-10.54%7.58%-6.39%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WOSC.L and DBC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2013

0.25

The correlation between WOSC.L and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOSC.L vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOSC.LDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

5.65

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.37

13.01

+3.36

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOSC.L and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOSC.LDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.24

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.71

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.52

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.22

+0.32

Drawdowns

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOSC.L drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -63.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOSC.L and DBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOSC.LDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-63.65%

+27.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-8.15%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-19.12%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.43%

-31.15%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-39.27%

+3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.61%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-32.83%

+27.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

3.54%

-1.50%

Volatility

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) is 3.44%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that WOSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOSC.LDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

7.16%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

16.90%

-7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

20.61%

-7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

19.40%

-3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.88%

18.52%

+2.36%

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOSC.L vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

WOSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.49%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WOSC.L and DBC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WOSC.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WOSC.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

WOSC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while DBC is Commodities. WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WOSC.L and 0.85% for DBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOSC.L and DBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer