PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOOPX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOOPX achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than DNLDX's 11.73% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOPX has underperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


WOOPX

1D
0.39%
1M
2.66%
YTD
7.93%
6M
8.28%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
7.38%

DNLDX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.72%
YTD
11.73%
6M
12.09%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOOPX
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund
7.93%-2.61%11.33%13.31%-18.98%23.19%10.20%26.22%-11.49%16.94%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
11.73%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between WOOPX and DNLDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1991

0.93

The correlation between WOOPX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOOPX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOOPX
WOOPX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WOOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
WOOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOOPXDNLDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.70

-1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

2.46

-1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.29

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

3.05

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.21

11.45

-9.24

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOOPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOOPX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOOPXDNLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.70

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.57

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.51

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.55

-0.08

Drawdowns

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOOPX drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOPX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOOPXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.15%

-63.69%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-7.29%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-20.42%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.94%

-23.42%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.30%

-42.23%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

0.00%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-9.63%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

1.94%

+2.46%

Volatility

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOOPXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.36%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

9.55%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

13.10%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

18.48%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

19.51%

+0.67%

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOOPX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOOPX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

WOOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than DNLDX's 13.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.45%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
WOOPX
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund
6.47%6.98%1.62%0.49%12.28%20.40%3.88%11.31%26.09%7.74%0.72%9.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WOOPX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WOOPX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to DNLDX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOPX dropped -58.15% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOOPX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer