PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOGSX vs. FLVCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in White Oak Select Growth Fund (WOGSX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOGSX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than FLVCX's 26.99% return. Over the past 10 years, WOGSX has underperformed FLVCX with an annualized return of 14.94%, while FLVCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.


WOGSX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
10.87%
6M
9.48%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
14.94%

FLVCX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.26%
YTD
26.99%
6M
25.31%
1Y
44.76%
3Y*
29.79%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
16.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth Fund
10.87%24.07%18.22%26.48%-25.72%28.31%18.91%23.74%-0.55%19.75%
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
26.99%20.34%26.95%26.10%-22.99%26.08%26.74%35.60%-16.43%20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between WOGSX and FLVCX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2000

0.80

The correlation between WOGSX and FLVCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOGSX vs. FLVCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOGSX
WOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
WOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FLVCX
FLVCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FLVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for White Oak Select Growth Fund (WOGSX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WOGSXFLVCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.56

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

12.93

-2.00

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FLVCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOGSX and FLVCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOGSX drawdown since its inception was -79.10%, which is greater than FLVCX's maximum drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOGSX and FLVCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOGSXFLVCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.10%

-70.02%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-13.06%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.07%

-28.54%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.56%

-28.54%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

-44.14%

+12.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

0.00%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.35%

-10.98%

-17.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.59%

-0.74%

Volatility

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for White Oak Select Growth Fund (WOGSX) is 5.36%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that WOGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOGSXFLVCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

9.08%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

18.05%

-6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

22.29%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.05%

23.07%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

23.51%

-3.57%

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOGSX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVCX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOGSX vs. FLVCX - Dividend Comparison

WOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than FLVCX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
3.72%4.72%14.53%12.19%18.49%8.40%0.11%0.10%19.91%18.96%27.48%6.18%
WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth Fund
7.34%8.14%12.24%5.00%0.49%5.18%2.57%1.81%1.40%0.66%1.02%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


WOGSX and FLVCX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLVCX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to WOGSX (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOGSX dropped -79.10% vs FLVCX's -70.02%.

WOGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOGSX and FLVCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer