WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L
WNUC.DE (WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc) and CMOD.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WNUC.DE is a Uranium fund tracking the WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index, while CMOD.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WNUC.DE returned 30.45% vs 31.34% for CMOD.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WNUC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CMOD.L.
Performance
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WNUC.DE is traded in EUR, while CMOD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CMOD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNUC.DE achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than CMOD.L's 23.00% return.
WNUC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.53%
- 6M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 30.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMOD.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 17.04%
- YTD
- 23.00%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- —
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WNUC.DE WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.01% | 101.66% |
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF | 23.00% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNUC.DE and CMOD.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNUC.DE
CMOD.L
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc (WNUC.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WNUC.DE | CMOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.31 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.54 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 7.77 | -5.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNUC.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum CMOD.L drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNUC.DE and CMOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNUC.DE | CMOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.80% | -31.91% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.80% | -12.26% | -15.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.90% | -7.09% | -18.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -14.67% | +5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.90% | 4.02% | +8.88% |
Volatility
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc (WNUC.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) at 4.51%. This indicates that WNUC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNUC.DE | CMOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.90% | 4.51% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.01% | 15.88% | +16.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.55% | 18.09% | +27.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.77% | 17.17% | +28.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.77% | 15.42% | +30.35% |
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNUC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOD.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNUC.DE vs. CMOD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WNUC.DE nor CMOD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WNUC.DE and CMOD.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMOD.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMOD.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WNUC.DE.
WNUC.DE is categorized as Uranium, while CMOD.L is Commodities. WNUC.DE tracks WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index, while CMOD.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity TR Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WNUC.DE and 0.19% for CMOD.L.
Find the right allocation for WNUC.DE and CMOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer