WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index while SBUY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WNRG.L returned 8.80%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for SBUY.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WNRG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SBUY.L.

Performance

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WNRG.L is traded in USD, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNRG.L achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, WNRG.L has underperformed SBUY.L with an annualized return of 8.80%, while SBUY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.

WNRG.L

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 4.49%
• 6M: 21.77%
• YTD: 27.75%
• 1Y: 37.39%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 20.55%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

SBUY.L

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.67%
• 6M: 6.70%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 1Y: 22.25%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 10.68%
• 10Y*: 12.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	27.75%	14.83%	2.07%	3.52%	46.61%	38.74%	-30.35%	9.89%	-14.99%	4.80%
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF	8.98%	30.78%	12.73%	15.23%	-11.50%	20.26%	11.75%	30.39%	-14.45%	20.88%

Correlation

The correlation between WNRG.L and SBUY.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between WNRG.L and SBUY.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNRG.L

WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

SBUY.L

SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WNRG.L	SBUY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.96	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.88	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	3.14	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	10.55	-3.86

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNRG.L and SBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than SBUY.L's maximum drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNRG.L and SBUY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WNRG.L	SBUY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.72%	-42.16%	-26.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.98%	-7.06%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.94%	-16.45%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.55%	-27.07%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.92%	-38.71%	-25.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.18%	-0.29%	-7.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.54%	-13.21%	-4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.57%	2.10%	+3.47%

Volatility

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.31%. This indicates that WNRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WNRG.L	SBUY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	2.31%	+3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.83%	8.46%	+9.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.62%	11.36%	+9.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.34%	15.78%	+8.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.35%	16.57%	+16.78%

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNRG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

WNRG.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF	1.69%	1.86%	1.80%	1.73%	1.91%	1.20%	1.62%	1.90%	1.31%	1.16%	1.60%	1.27%
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WNRG.L and SBUY.L in my portfolio?

WNRG.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WNRG.L or SBUY.L?

On fees, WNRG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WNRG.L or SBUY.L?

WNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

What is the main difference between WNRG.L and SBUY.L?

WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index, while SBUY.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNRG.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.