PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) and Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNDU.L achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than XLBS.L's 12.49% return. Over the past 10 years, WNDU.L has outperformed XLBS.L with an annualized return of 12.33%, while XLBS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.


WNDU.L

1D
0.27%
1M
0.54%
YTD
11.60%
6M
12.72%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
12.33%

XLBS.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.77%
YTD
12.49%
6M
16.60%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WNDU.L
SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF
11.60%24.98%13.42%22.92%-12.69%16.14%11.74%27.43%-14.96%25.36%
XLBS.L
Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
12.49%11.15%-0.84%12.27%-12.07%27.01%20.06%23.52%-15.00%23.40%

Correlation

The correlation between WNDU.L and XLBS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.80

The correlation between WNDU.L and XLBS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WNDU.L
XLBS.L

Industrials

95.1%
1.6%

Technology

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
8.6%

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%
89.8%

Energy

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

WNDU.L
95.1%
XLBS.L
1.6%

Technology

WNDU.L
3.5%
XLBS.L

-

Utilities

WNDU.L
2.8%
XLBS.L

-

Communication Services

WNDU.L
0.6%
XLBS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

WNDU.L
0.3%
XLBS.L
8.6%

Financial Services

WNDU.L
0.3%
XLBS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

WNDU.L
0.1%
XLBS.L

-

Basic Materials

WNDU.L
0.1%
XLBS.L
89.8%

Energy

WNDU.L
0.1%
XLBS.L

-

Real Estate

WNDU.L
0.0%
XLBS.L

-

Healthcare

WNDU.L

-

XLBS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNDU.L
WNDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
WNDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XLBS.L
XLBS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLBS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLBS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) and Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WNDU.LXLBS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.60

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

4.81

+2.50

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the XLBS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNDU.L and XLBS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WNDU.LXLBS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.14

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.26

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.50

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.50

+0.20

Drawdowns

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNDU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than XLBS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDU.L and XLBS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WNDU.LXLBS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.99%

-35.84%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.68%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-23.04%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-25.27%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.99%

-35.84%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-3.56%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-6.80%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.89%

-0.92%

Volatility

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) is 5.55%, while Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that WNDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLBS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WNDU.LXLBS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

6.17%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

13.30%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

16.51%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

18.91%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

19.52%

-1.73%

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WNDU.L nor XLBS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WNDU.L and XLBS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLBS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLBS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNDU.L.

WNDU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XLBS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNDU.L and 0.14% for XLBS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNDU.L and XLBS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer