WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L
WNDU.L (SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF) and XLBS.L (Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - WNDU.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while XLBS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WNDU.L returned 12.33%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for XLBS.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WNDU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLBS.L.
Performance
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNDU.L achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than XLBS.L's 12.49% return. Over the past 10 years, WNDU.L has outperformed XLBS.L with an annualized return of 12.33%, while XLBS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.
WNDU.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
XLBS.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNDU.L SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF | 11.60% | 24.98% | 13.42% | 22.92% | -12.69% | 16.14% | 11.74% | 27.43% | -14.96% | 25.36% |
XLBS.L Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 12.49% | 11.15% | -0.84% | 12.27% | -12.07% | 27.01% | 20.06% | 23.52% | -15.00% | 23.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNDU.L and XLBS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between WNDU.L and XLBS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
Industrials
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
Technology
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
-
Utilities
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
-
Communication Services
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
Financial Services
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
-
Basic Materials
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
Energy
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
-
Real Estate
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
-
Healthcare
WNDU.L
-
XLBS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNDU.L
XLBS.L
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) and Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WNDU.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.60 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 4.81 | +2.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WNDU.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.26 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.50 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.50 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNDU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than XLBS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDU.L and XLBS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNDU.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -35.84% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -11.68% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.33% | -23.04% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.15% | -25.27% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.99% | -35.84% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -3.56% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -6.80% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.89% | -0.92% |
Volatility
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) is 5.55%, while Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that WNDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLBS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNDU.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 6.17% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 13.30% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 16.51% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 18.91% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 19.52% | -1.73% |
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNDU.L vs. XLBS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WNDU.L nor XLBS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WNDU.L and XLBS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNDU.L.
WNDU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XLBS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNDU.L and 0.14% for XLBS.L.
Find the right allocation for WNDU.L and XLBS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer