PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNDU.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WNDU.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNDU.L achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than USDV.L's 6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, WNDU.L has outperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 12.33%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.


WNDU.L

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
11.60%
6M
13.13%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
12.33%

USDV.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.96%
6M
7.95%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WNDU.L
SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF
11.60%24.98%13.42%22.92%-12.69%16.14%11.74%27.43%-14.96%25.36%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.96%8.78%7.52%1.58%-0.35%25.59%0.26%24.49%-4.25%16.89%

Correlation

The correlation between WNDU.L and USDV.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between WNDU.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WNDU.L
USDV.L

Industrials

95.1%
17.5%

Technology

3.5%
8.9%

Utilities

2.8%
14.8%

Communication Services

0.6%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
5.2%

Financial Services

0.3%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
17.0%

Basic Materials

0.1%
6.4%

Energy

0.1%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
4.6%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Industrials

WNDU.L
95.1%
USDV.L
17.5%

Technology

WNDU.L
3.5%
USDV.L
8.9%

Utilities

WNDU.L
2.8%
USDV.L
14.8%

Communication Services

WNDU.L
0.6%
USDV.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

WNDU.L
0.3%
USDV.L
5.2%

Financial Services

WNDU.L
0.3%
USDV.L
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

WNDU.L
0.1%
USDV.L
17.0%

Basic Materials

WNDU.L
0.1%
USDV.L
6.4%

Energy

WNDU.L
0.1%
USDV.L
4.5%

Real Estate

WNDU.L
0.0%
USDV.L
4.6%

Healthcare

WNDU.L

-

USDV.L
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNDU.L
WNDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
WNDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WNDU.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.85

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

4.63

+2.68

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNDU.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WNDU.LUSDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.34

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.41

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.57

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.74

-0.04

Drawdowns

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNDU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than USDV.L's maximum drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDU.L and USDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WNDU.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.99%

-35.73%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-6.96%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-15.11%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-15.11%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.99%

-35.73%

-3.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-3.75%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-3.39%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.79%

+0.18%

Volatility

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that WNDU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WNDU.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

2.40%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

6.87%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

9.63%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

13.84%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

15.76%

+2.03%

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WNDU.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

WNDU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%
WNDU.L
SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WNDU.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WNDU.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WNDU.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

WNDU.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. WNDU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNDU.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNDU.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer