WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L
WNDU.L (SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF) and IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - WNDU.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IUIS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WNDU.L returned 11.43%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for IUIS.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WNDU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIS.L.
Performance
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNDU.L achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than IUIS.L's 12.57% return.
WNDU.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
IUIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- —
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNDU.L SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF | 11.60% | 24.98% | 13.42% | 22.92% | -12.69% | 16.14% | 11.74% | 27.43% | -14.96% | 18.75% |
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.57% | 19.24% | 17.42% | 17.93% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 9.96% | 28.50% | -14.17% | 16.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNDU.L and IUIS.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between WNDU.L and IUIS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
Technology
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
Utilities
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
Communication Services
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
Financial Services
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
-
Basic Materials
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
Energy
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
-
Real Estate
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
-
Healthcare
WNDU.L
-
IUIS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNDU.L
IUIS.L
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WNDU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.21 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 8.53 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WNDU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.58 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.70 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNDU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum IUIS.L drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDU.L and IUIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNDU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -42.18% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -10.42% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.33% | -19.59% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.15% | -21.22% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -0.84% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -5.14% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.70% | +0.27% |
Volatility
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) at 4.96%. This indicates that WNDU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNDU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 4.96% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 11.91% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 14.58% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 17.30% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 19.62% | -1.83% |
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNDU.L vs. IUIS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WNDU.L nor IUIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, WNDU.L and IUIS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUIS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNDU.L.
WNDU.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IUIS.L is S&P 500. WNDU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNDU.L and 0.15% for IUIS.L.
Find the right allocation for WNDU.L and IUIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer