WNDG.L vs. SILG.L
WNDG.L (Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - WNDG.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WNDG.L returned -0.34%/yr vs 45.51%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WNDG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.
Performance
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNDG.L achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's 5.62% return.
WNDG.L
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -7.33%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 43.50%
- 3Y*
- -0.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 98.68%
- 3Y*
- 45.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNDG.L Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 16.77% | 23.53% | -18.76% | -23.82% | 10.77% |
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 5.62% | 153.98% | 13.53% | -6.34% | -8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNDG.L and SILG.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNDG.L
SILG.L
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WNDG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 3.16 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.13 | 7.69 | +8.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WNDG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.98 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.68 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNDG.L drawdown since its inception was -52.03%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDG.L and SILG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNDG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.03% | -32.00% | -20.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -30.90% | +22.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.56% | -30.90% | -8.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.30% | -24.56% | +3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -12.52% | -16.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 12.74% | -10.05% |
Volatility
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L) is 4.77%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 18.48%. This indicates that WNDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNDG.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 18.48% | -13.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 39.95% | -26.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 49.23% | -29.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 39.40% | -18.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 39.40% | -18.70% |
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNDG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNDG.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WNDG.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WNDG.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WNDG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WNDG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.
WNDG.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. WNDG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WNDG.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.
Find the right allocation for WNDG.L and SILG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer