PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.10%9.08%14.49%7.33%-8.31%16.96%-1.30%11.92%
SWLD.L
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
-3.15%12.85%21.19%17.70%-8.06%23.66%12.00%14.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMVG.L achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than SWLD.L's -3.15% return.


WMVG.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
0.10%
6M
1.24%
1Y
2.38%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*

SWLD.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
0.91%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMVG.L
WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLD.L
SWLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMVG.LSWLD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.13

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.36

1.59

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.24

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

1.42

-1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.97

6.25

-5.28

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMVG.L and SWLD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMVG.LSWLD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.13

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.83

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.80

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between WMVG.L and SWLD.L is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMVG.L nor SWLD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than SWLD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMVG.L and SWLD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WMVG.LSWLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.25%

-25.85%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-10.45%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-18.65%

+3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-5.39%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-3.23%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.37%

-0.57%

Volatility

WMVG.L vs. SWLD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) is 2.77%, while SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that WMVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WMVG.LSWLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

4.04%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

7.94%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

14.23%

-3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

13.25%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.23%

15.36%

-3.13%